Instant feedback on drafts mapped to the teacher's rubric
Intermediate14h1–2
LLMNext.jsPostgres
17/20Anonymous Peer Code Review
Students review each other's code anonymously with a guided checklist.
Intermediate14h2–3 people16/20 fit
Build Anonymous Peer Code Review for programming courses in ~14h with 2–3 people. Stack: Next.js + Postgres + LLM.
Why it wins: Builds real engineering skills.
Build flow
01 · Problem
Students rarely see others' code or get feedback beyond grades.
02 · Solution
Assign anonymous review pairs, provide a checklist, collect inline comments and let an LLM coach reviewers to be specific.
03 · Build
- 1Assign pairs
- 2Build diff view
- 3Add comments
- 4Coach reviews
04 · Demo
Review a submission and see the coaching tip.
MVP checklist
- Anonymous pairing
- Checklist
- Inline comments
- Reviewer coaching
Tech stack
| Tech | Role | |
|---|---|---|
| Next.js | Frontend + API routes | Web |
| Postgres | Relational database | Data |
| LLM | Language model | AI |
Related ideas
More EdTechEdTech
AI-Use Transparency Log
Students record how they used AI on an assignment for honest disclosure
Intermediate12h1–2Next.jsLLMPostgres17/20Students run and get graded on Python exercises entirely in the browser
Intermediate16h1–2PyodideNext.jsPostgres18/20